Wednesday, December 30, 2020
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
DO YOU KNOW THE FIRST STEP TO BE BORN AGAIN? YOU MUST LEARN TO HATE WHO YOU ARE IN THE NAME OF JESUS.
DO YOU KNOW THE FIRST STEP TO BE BORN AGAIN? YOU MUST LEARN TO HATE WHO YOU ARE IN THE NAME OF JESUS.
Where in the Bible did you get this Doctrine of belief from...The first step to being "Born Again" or "Regenerated" is faith in Yeshua/Jesus Christ. The Bible is clear that the only means of regeneration is by faith in the finished work of Christ on the cross. "If Christ's work on the cross is finished then what work is there left for you to do?" No amount of good works or keeping of the law can regenerate the heart which from birth is “deceitful and wicked above all things” The reason it's hard, actually impossible for a person to LEARN TO HATE WHO YOU/THEY ARE IN THE NAME OF JESUS is that your "Salvation" is then conditioned on your own Self Effort or your own "Work(s)" in the practice of HATING WHO YOU ARE IN THE NAME OF JESUS. Hate yourself in my name of Jesus to enter the Kingdom of Heaven...is this really what Jesus was preaching/teaching to Nicodemus.
(NIV) John 3:1-5 Jesus Teaches Nicodemus 1 Now there was a Pharisee, a man named Nicodemus who was a member of the Jewish ruling council. 2 He came to Jesus at night and said, “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God. For no one could perform the signs you are doing if God were not with him.” 3 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.[a]” 4 “How can someone be born when they are old?” Nicodemus asked. “Surely they cannot enter a second time into their mother’s womb to be born!” 5 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. 6 Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit[b] gives birth to spirit. 7 You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You[c] must be born again.’ 8 The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.”[d]
We know scripture says that Salvation cannot be achieved through works it is the free gift of God....so how does LEARNING TO HATE WHO YOU ARE IN THE NAME OF JESUS influences or makes God "Regenerate" you? The sign of "Regeneration" is the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in a person "this is the meaning of being born of the Spirit" so the question is are you "Born Again" or "Regenerated" if you never received the Holy Spirit? UNFORTUNATELY CAN'T NOBODY FIND ANY BORN AGAIN GAYS...so where does it say in the Bible that homosexuals cannot be "Born of the Spirit/Have the Holy Ghost" and will not be given "Salvation/Regeneration-You can't see the Kingdom of God without being "Regenerated." You are definitely not regenerated if you never received the Holy Ghost.
The reason you can't find Born Again gays is that you believe your Bible says that "Born Again" gays are fairy-tales, and don't exist and anyone that says they are "Gay" and "Born Again" is a lying "Demon Child" of Satan trying to tempt you but will be going straight to hell for blaspheming the Holy Spirit. If you believe it and say it you ought to be able to demonstrate you know it because you can show it- where is the scripture or scriptures that you are relying on that demonstrate what you believe is also the truth revealed in the word of God.
When what you believe you know from the Bible isn't found in the Bible it's time to find out the truth. After you have been "Regenerated" one of the first tasks one embarks on is in finding the truth- you have to be willing to REJECT ALL UNTRUE INFORMATION LEARNED WHILE YOU WERE UNREGENERATE AND ACQUIRE NEW UNDERSTANDING AND NEW INFORMATION IN YOUR REGENERATED STATE. In short you have to reevaluate your spiritual knowledge realizing that while you were un-regenerated you didn't now anything and what you thought you knew wasn't the truth...Just like in Philippians 3 you have to count all things before regeneration as all loss throwing off the dirty clothes of the old man while putting on the new garments of the new man.
Start by understanding 2 Timothy 2:15. Is what you believe of scripture coming from your Religion, your Tradition, your own knowledge/someone elses interpretation...The truth is what you believe of scripture should only come from the source of the Holy Spirit- The comforter, the guide, etc...Spiritual education is one of the primaary functions of the Holy Spirit. BUT UNTIL YOU SEE IT FOR YOURSELF IT'S WISHFUL THINKING-
This is why every thing you think you know has to to be verified through the scripture by you via the Holy Ghost...If you think you know it you'll never know that you don't know it and you reject the truth in error when it is presented to you because it's nothing that you know...in short you accept the lies and reject the truth because your religion, tradition , knowledge or other people never exposed you to the truth, you never learned the truth. Here are some topics and issues people think they know but don't.
True/False
1. The Primary reason shown by Genesis 19 that Sodom and Gomorrah where destroyed was because of homosexuality.
Answer: Ezekiel 16:49-50 -God tells us through His prophet specifically why He destroyed Sodom and her Sister Gomorrah.
Is what you thought you knew the truth?
True/False
2. You are not born homosexual, homosexuality is an abomination therefore there is no truth in the belief God creates homosexuals from the womb.
Answer: Matthew 19:12 answers the question but you have to understand what a Eunuch was in the context of the age...Specifically what does it mean spiritually to be a Eunuch born so from their mother's womb and what does it mean Physically to be a Eunuch born so from their mother's womb.
Is what you thought you knew the truth?
True/False
3. Adultery, Fornication, and Homosexuality are all Abominable sexual sins punishable by death God's Law forbid all types of sexual sin.
Answer: Exodus 20 reveals the 10 commandments of God's law and Exodus 20:14 the Seventh commandment only lists Adultery which has a specific definition of it's meaning...How did Fornication and Homosexuality get added to the meaning of the words in God's Law....
Is what you thought you knew the truth?
When it comes to scripture from the world it's not trust then verify it is verify before you trust...the only source of Spiritual knowledge that you can trust is revealed from the Holy Spirit. Hope this helps you!
Thursday, July 11, 2013
Super-cop George Zimmerman's Depraved Hunt!
The State doesn't/didn't have a tightly-knit case theory that could easily be explained to the jury...so here it is!
The Encounter: George Zimmerman Super-Cop-without a cause
Zimmerman driving down to the store when he notices something out of the ordinary, the notices that one individual that seems to be out of place… A suspicious street punk who has no business being in his neighborhood, but wait there is something odd about this @#$%@^. The perpetrator has something in his pocket and it’s weighing his hoody down it’s about 16", 18” long and heavy just like my gun. This is it this is my chance to do something that the police force would have to take notice of. I’ll catch my first perpetrator…I’ll follow him to see where he is going and who knows I may be able to catch him red-handed in the act of armed burglary.
This is where the hunt started, this is where it all began that day when judge I mean George Zimmerman decided he was going to be a super-cop (a super-cop without a cause). Zimmerman finally had a chance to display his above ordinary skills and training, he had made the perp out to have a gun… And this was something that it took skill and training to recognize the unrecognizable...recognizing the criminal mind and criminal intent in someone being where they shouldn’t have been with a gun in his pocket. How did you know George, how did you catch him…Well when I noticed him he had something in his pocket and it was the gun and the rest you know is history. George Zimmerman Super-cop only this super-cop had no cause and more importantly because of other factors known George Zimmerman at the time he would most likely never be a cop.
Zimmerman has intense firsthand experience with how difficult it can be to nail down a perpetrator to an ultimate conviction he knows that he has to be smart and stay one step ahead, because if you have to keep up then you have already lost. Zimmerman has had 40+ experiences with these punks, and they all had one thing in common they all got away but this time this situation was going to be different, this one was not going to get away. This time Zimmerman had vowed to himself that this punk, this one, he was not going to let get away. Zimmerman would do and was doing all that he could to make sure that this time this one…would not get away. This was a hunt and too Zimmerman Trayvon Martin wasn’t human he was an animal and this animal wasn’t going to get away…These punks they always get away, but this time it wasn't going to happen like the other 40 times before...this time this punk was going to get away.
Here is where we establish the mindset of Zimmerman, because Zimmerman was in hunt mode and because he was in the hunt mode… He had no consideration for Trayvon Martin’s life as another human being. Now we go back to an earlier reference in evidence which is what was the answer to the question Why do you want to be a Police officer? What was reason that Zimmerman gave as to why he wanted to be a police officer? If you look in evidence you’ll see (insert quote”) part of the excitement of being a police officer for Zimmerman was the hunt and in this moment he had an opportunity to hunt his favorite prey, "Human Beings" not "Real Human Beings" the ones who looked like those described on those 40+ phone calls, the ones who Zimmerman knew as the ones who always got away.
Note to self must improve surveillance and tailing skills (stop) I have visual confirmation that the perpetrator has made me out and he knows that I am following him… I expect the perpetrator to begin to take evasive maneuvers in response…if the perpetrator is successful in eluding me I expect him to return promptly to his original activity when the coast is clear. The perpetrator has made a grave strategic and tactical error in a maneuver to find cover he has entered into my home territory…a position where I have the advantage... it is no longer possible to pursue by vehicle he’s trying to make a break for it. While these thoughts were occurring the physical activities that were occurring was the non-emergency call to the police department… which occurred in the thick of the moment this is why when the dispatcher asked are you following him and Zimmerman said yes and the dispatcher specifically said “we don’t need you to do that” Every hunter knows you do not break off the chase until you have caught your prey…even taking the time to make this phone call has caused Zimmerman to lose visual and Zimmerman would have to pick up the trail again but he can't do that if he is stuck at location waiting for a cop. Dispatcher: What’s your address sir so the police can meet you? We know the rest!
Trayvon was on his final route home on the phone when he said these words…there was no escaping this relentless pursuit he had tried avoidance but Zimmerman would not let the situation be avoided so where do you run when there is nowhere to run….It ‘s time to ask the question what are you following me for. When you are being hunted there is no such thing as the prey calling off the hunt this is only reserved for the hunter for reasons like it’s to dark and late,(Zimmerman wouldn't be stopped by that-that's why you have a flashlight) the prey Is out of territory boundaries,(Zimmerman's Perspective: According to Stand Your Ground, the whole state of Florida is my territory-no problems there) mistaken identity,(no mistake he doesn't belong here...look at him). There was no way Trayvon could have stopped this, and the main reason is this Trayvon didn't start it...every confirmed reaction of Trayvon was because of one thing and one thing only, the hostile, safety threatening, life threatening hunt and pursuit actions of George Zimmerman. Why didn't you call of the hunt George, why didn't you stay in the car. The prey never can stop the hunt…but that is man to animal, but man to man the hunted has the ability to ask the hunter, “Why are you doing this?”
This is where all questions were answered and this is where the motive began that ended Trayvon’s life when Zimmerman finally caught up to Trayvon Martin and Trayvon had the opportunity to ask:
Whatcha following me for? Now in this time period this is where Zimmerman found out how wrong he was and realized the consequences of his actions because Trayvon actually had truth on his side and Zimmerman all he had now was crazy imaginations, crazy because he misinterpreted everything, crazy because everything he thought was skill and training turned out to be his own crazy delusions…What about you being in this area I, I know all my neighbors and I’ve never seen you before? I live off of….. What about the gun in your hoody? Man what gun this is some tea and some skittles... If you live there then why were you over here? It’s raining and plus you were following me like some crazy ass cracker oh like I'm supposed to lead you to my house with my little brother there? Reality set in Super-cop who was now Super-flop...his ticket into the police force became full-fledged validation of why he would never be a cop of why they would never give him a badge. What could George do the police were on their way and it is only a matter of time before they catch up to him and question him, but what is he going to say?
If I tell them what really happened I’m screwed, If he goes home and tells his family they might call it in and I’m screwed… I’ll tell them a lie but too many loose ends if they find out the truth I’m screwed….I need to make sure that he doesn’t get home I need to kill him…but how do I kill him and make it legal Then George remembered his course “Stand your Ground” he knew that in order for stand your ground to work he would have to make the killing look like self-defense, in order for self-defense to be believed there has to be a clear fight…if I can prove self-defense because of the fight then all the other problems would just melt away. At this point every action that Zimmerman took was with the goal of killing Trayvon Martin and making it look like Self-defense, it had to be done now and he was the only one to do it. This is “Depraved Indifference” because his life and his dream depended on one thing too George Zimmerman and that one thing was killing Trayvon Martin while making it look like self-defense.
As Trayvon thought the situation was handled he began going home again he’s back on the phone and walking home then Zimmerman decides it’s now or never It has to look like self-defense...so he charged him from behind this is where the struggle began initiated by Zimmerman. The fight wasa started the way all cowards start fights he jumped him from by behind?
This is where the witnesses testimony start all except one who can say they have no relation to Trayvon Martin or Zimmerman…curiously the one witness who saw the same event as 3 other people has a relationship with Zimmerman and his account is different from the rest essentially 1 is telling the truth and 3 are lying but this is not the case….The real situation is that 3 are telling the truth without any self-interest and 1 is partially telling the truth for the interest of himself and his friend.
Witness Good's testimony is troubling because he’s the only one of 4 that says something different but when you actually look at what he said, you find he doesn’t actually say it… “I can’t be sure if it was Trayvon or Zimmerman on top I am sure that the person on the bottom was lighter.” So why is it that you a reasonable person can’t testify as too who was on top and who was on the bottom. Or shall I ask it this way why is that you won’t say under oath who was on top and who was on bottom. You clearly want us to believe that it was Zimmerman on the bottom, but you never say it because you saw Zimmerman on both the top and the bottom… You recognized and saw Zimmerman on top before the gunshot and you saw him on the bottom after the gun shot. So I guess your answer might be kind of sort of true as long as you didn’t ask the question when was the lighter skin person on the bottom.
You heard a commotion outside it was loud enough to get your attention so you went outside and when you went outside you were surprised right before your eyes was a person that looked like George your neighborhood watchman in an MMX matchup. See the thing about good friends or acquaintances is we not only recognize them when he hear them we recognize them when we see them. So if you didn’t know George when you saw him you certainly knew him when you heard him when he called out to you asking for help (Georgy was asking you for help but it wasn’t for the fight He needed help on how to clean up this mess. You walked out and saw Zimmerman who you recognized as your neighborhood watchman in control of the situation when you recognized what was happening as you described it as “Ground and Pound” you knew that he the neighborhood watchman had control of the situation or else you would have helped out your neighborhood watchman… You knew as George knew from the technique being used that George had the weight advantage and the power advantage….The reason it’s called "Ground and Pound" is that you ground your opponent or pin them to the ground with your superior weight and while they are unable to move and flat on their back you use your power to pound them…but this situation was different he saw grounding but he didn’t see pounding he saw a lot of motion but we know there weren't any blows because (we know Trayvon had no signs of fighting-this means that the person indicated by three witnesses that was on the wrong end of ground and pound had no injuries) and why is that because Zimmerman could not afford to put any signs of an altercation on Trayvon if there were any signs of an altercation Zimmerman had to make sure that he suffered them and Trayvon didn’t have any marks of a fight and at this particular time neither did Georgie. His Neighborhood watchman George had control of the situation, he knew he was trying to make the police force, and he knew that catching someone in the act of crime might make all the difference in helping his neighborhood watchman make the force so he was eager…to call the police.
Going back to right after Good made his phone call to the police
Zimmerman's first words after shooting
Zimmerman: I need you to come and help me the police are already on the way
Why weren't they call an ambulance, because he needed Trayvon to be dead
When Good went in to make the phone call, this where Zimmerman realized Trayvon Martin, He’s got to die- and I have to make it look as if I was just defending myself...Good is going to call the police again so they will no where to come & nobody is here to see so I have to do the killing before Good comes back out of that door. This has to be just right I have to slide my hand back to my holster pull out my gun roll over positioning the perpetrator on top of me and shoot him so that he dies...end of problem. The gun had to be aimed before he rolled over because He would not have time to Aim it after he flipped...So he pressed the gun at his heart and rolled this is why the shot wasn't dead center because when he released Martin the target moved about 4" from the muzzle of the gun before it was fired.
Strange thing to say--- the other person is dead if you don’t know the people involved and hear a gunshot…you don’t say the other person is dead you say somebody got shot. This is significant because of it’s specificity because this moment on the phone with the police it tells us exactly what a truthful testimony from Good should have been. Good told us by his recorded response…..Holy shit the other person is dead. See the last things Good saw before he called the police was George Zimmerman in control in Superior position of the Ground and Pound technique, Good heard exactly who was crying for help, we now know Trayvon Martin was crying for help and Good actually saw the gun in Zimmerman’s hand. How do we know that Good saw the gun because when the gun went off while he was on the phone with the police the cries for help immediately stopped, if Zimmerman was really the one crying for help then Good would have reasonably concluded that his neighborhood watchman was dead, but the next words of Good tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Holy shit, the other person is dead. You only say the other person is dead…when the person you know isn’t dead…and what did Good know, he knew Zimmerman- his neighborhood watchman had the gun he knew it because he saw it… he knew the cries for help stopped immediately after the gun was fired. George- the neighborhood watchman had the gun why would he be dead, he knew that the cries for help came from the other person whom Good didn't know so when the gun fired and the cries stopped...Good knew Zimmerman wasn't dead. Good knew as much and he said as much unfiltered....Holy shit, the other person is dead.
I don't know why Zimmerman was screaming for his life, especially in this fight he initiated because he had all the advantages; size, experience, training, and the gun...when you look at all of that...then why was Zimmerman in a life threatening situation? There is no reasonable reason why Zimmerman should be in mortal fear of his life as indicated by Trayvon screaming in the 911 screams...even in starting the fight Zimmerman was going to win and he knew it. The weights of these two individuals was different enough that professionally they would be in different weight classes an untrained middleweight against a trained heavyweight. Who do you think would win that fight? Dividing up boxing/MMX into weight classes helped to reduce the number of lop sided victories and the ability of fighters to pick on smaller opponents. After Middleweight you have Super-Middleweight, Light-heavyweight, Cruiserweight and then you reach Heavyweight...this means Zimmerman and Trayvon would never fight in a professional matchup because the fight ticket wouldn't be fair. How can you be reasonably in fear of your life in a fight this unfair a fight you mathematically win before it is even started? This massacre to borrow a fight term happened because physically Zimmerman was not in fear of his life, he had no reason to be. In fact when you look all that occurred that George did the one thing you can't find is fear...because Super-cops have no fear. I don't know why Zimmerman would be screaming it defies common sense. But what doesn't defy common sense is why Trayvon Martin was screaming for his life and this is why...because at this time Super-cop is on top of Trayvon Martin, the gun is visible and Zimmerman had made it perfectly clear to Trayvon that tonight you’re gonna die….Trayvon was pinned down he couldn’t move and all that he could do was scream for his life. Zimmerman was on a time clock this is the time when Zimmerman told Trayvon now you are going too die, you are going to die tonight…if you don’t fight back your death will be instant and painless one bullet right through the heart. Zimmerman put the gun flush to Trayvon's heart rolled over maneuvering Trayvon on Top made sure he was in position released his grip long enough to allow Trayvon to begin pulling back and then fired: one, two, three, Four...Aim, Roll, Release, and Fire. Trayvon Martin died with hope, the last moment of hope that Trayvon Martin had was when Zimmerman rolled over and let him go 4" of separation from the gun muzzle and Trayvons heart, Trayvon was shot resulting in his death...but because Zimmerman had a plan that hope of Trayvon and Trayvon's life was cut short.
And this is when Good comes back on the scene asking what happened and being told by Zimmerman the truth, (because you need the truth to make the perfect lie) this where the coverup begins at the moment when you have a friendly neighbor willing to help out and a Super-cop on the scene one who knows you need physical injuries and not just any kind of injuries, you need the kind of injuries that anyone would reasonably say would put you in fear of your life. You need multiple head injuries 2 head injuries will do the job. 1 may be an accident 2 shows me that there was some intent.
We don’t have enough information to say how and who put the injuries on Zimmerman but we do know he had motive and opportunity and the police knowledge behind Zimmerman's injury plants. Police professionals know the nose bleed and the head injury are very bloody injuries they are the most bloody injuries that can be made with the least amount of force to create them, nose bleeds and head injuries both look bloody horrible…and here is the real police knowledge about head injuries is that any head injuries allow you to reasonably make a case that you were reasonably in fear of your life...if you're going to claim self-defense you better have a head injury! The nose bleed and the head injuries were both for show that’s why it never made sense that the injuries were just to minor to be received in the fight Zimmerman described...they were too damn small to be important as injuries...Zimmerman’s head injuries were consistent with someone tenderly and lovingly hitting his head on the concrete once or twice to get the look of head injuries but not the effects. Zimmerman's head injuries were made so they would get the look but not the effects. This was staged as if it were done by himself or a Good friend.
The answer is simple it’s because it has to be the truth based on all the facts that we can examine…all the facts are consistent with a motive and opportunity for George Zimmerman and this cannot be disputed…the defense wanted you to believe that Trayvon Martin had motives and an opportunities and the intent for killing George Zimmerman. What are they. we can't tell because they don't exist but when we look at the other side and ask the question what motives did Zimmerman have for killing Trayvon he had at least 40+ reasons but the most important to Georgie was if Trayvon goes home alive I'll never be a police officer.
Do you know anything about Stand your ground….what was Zimmerman’s answer? And finally if you had it to do it all over again would you do anything differently. What was Zimmerman’s answer?
George! The 6th commandment is Thou shalt not kill. Jury...this means, It wasn’t God’s will for Trayvon to be dead, it was George Zimmerman's will. A will I know and the facts and evidence shows came from a sick, depraved, mentally unstable man who possessed the motive, the opportunity, and the depraved will that killed (ended the short Human life of Trayvon Martin). It was not God's will that killed Trayvon Martin, it was George Zimmerman’s will and gun and depraved heart that killed Trayvon Martin. It was George Zimmerman's gun that killed Trayvon Martin...It was George Zimmerman's will that Trayvon Martin had to die.
The 2 major requirements necessary for any crime to be committed is "Motive" and "Opportunity" usually the more depraved the crime is…the more passionate the motive. Motives can be rational or irrational, understood or not understood but they are always personal…meaning whatever the value and significance of the motive is. It is the greatest desire of the person that has the motive. What was the greatest desire of Zimmerman? Do you think if he knew he could get away with it that Zimmerman would have killed to achieve his greatest desire? I know the answer to this question and I believe the evidence shows that there is only one reasonable conclusion that can be reached when we put together all the facts and evidence in this case. I’m not asking you to put together the facts in the way the state wants nor am I asking you to put the facts together the facts in the way that the defense wants. I’m not asking you to include certain facts here and eliminate certain facts there to put together an opinion…no I am asking you to do what juries are supposed to do which carefully examine all facts and evidence, consider all testimony to it’s truth, based on what is logical, what is reasonable and what is truth. The truth is Zimmerman callously without feeling or remorse killed Trayvon Martin, why because Trayvon Martin put in jeopardy the one thing Zimmerman had wanted his whole life….and we all know what that is. Trayvon Martin’s fate was sealed on Feb 26 when Zimmerman realized that if Trayvon made it home that his life pursuit would be over! In Zimmerman’s mind it was life or death because in the instant when it mattered Trayvon’s continued life meant the death of his dream.
Prosecution version of the Facts tied together based on all the Evidence and "Determinations of Truth" which are Reasonably constructed
The Encounter: George Zimmerman Super-Cop-without a cause
Zimmerman driving down to the store when he notices something out of the ordinary, the notices that one individual that seems to be out of place… A suspicious street punk who has no business being in his neighborhood, but wait there is something odd about this @#$%@^. The perpetrator has something in his pocket and it’s weighing his hoody down it’s about 16", 18” long and heavy just like my gun. This is it this is my chance to do something that the police force would have to take notice of. I’ll catch my first perpetrator…I’ll follow him to see where he is going and who knows I may be able to catch him red-handed in the act of armed burglary.
This is where the hunt started, this is where it all began that day when judge I mean George Zimmerman decided he was going to be a super-cop (a super-cop without a cause). Zimmerman finally had a chance to display his above ordinary skills and training, he had made the perp out to have a gun… And this was something that it took skill and training to recognize the unrecognizable...recognizing the criminal mind and criminal intent in someone being where they shouldn’t have been with a gun in his pocket. How did you know George, how did you catch him…Well when I noticed him he had something in his pocket and it was the gun and the rest you know is history. George Zimmerman Super-cop only this super-cop had no cause and more importantly because of other factors known George Zimmerman at the time he would most likely never be a cop.
The Hunt- These punks they always get away
Zimmerman has intense firsthand experience with how difficult it can be to nail down a perpetrator to an ultimate conviction he knows that he has to be smart and stay one step ahead, because if you have to keep up then you have already lost. Zimmerman has had 40+ experiences with these punks, and they all had one thing in common they all got away but this time this situation was going to be different, this one was not going to get away. This time Zimmerman had vowed to himself that this punk, this one, he was not going to let get away. Zimmerman would do and was doing all that he could to make sure that this time this one…would not get away. This was a hunt and too Zimmerman Trayvon Martin wasn’t human he was an animal and this animal wasn’t going to get away…These punks they always get away, but this time it wasn't going to happen like the other 40 times before...this time this punk was going to get away.
Here is where we establish the mindset of Zimmerman, because Zimmerman was in hunt mode and because he was in the hunt mode… He had no consideration for Trayvon Martin’s life as another human being. Now we go back to an earlier reference in evidence which is what was the answer to the question Why do you want to be a Police officer? What was reason that Zimmerman gave as to why he wanted to be a police officer? If you look in evidence you’ll see (insert quote”) part of the excitement of being a police officer for Zimmerman was the hunt and in this moment he had an opportunity to hunt his favorite prey, "Human Beings" not "Real Human Beings" the ones who looked like those described on those 40+ phone calls, the ones who Zimmerman knew as the ones who always got away.
The Chase
Note to self must improve surveillance and tailing skills (stop) I have visual confirmation that the perpetrator has made me out and he knows that I am following him… I expect the perpetrator to begin to take evasive maneuvers in response…if the perpetrator is successful in eluding me I expect him to return promptly to his original activity when the coast is clear. The perpetrator has made a grave strategic and tactical error in a maneuver to find cover he has entered into my home territory…a position where I have the advantage... it is no longer possible to pursue by vehicle he’s trying to make a break for it. While these thoughts were occurring the physical activities that were occurring was the non-emergency call to the police department… which occurred in the thick of the moment this is why when the dispatcher asked are you following him and Zimmerman said yes and the dispatcher specifically said “we don’t need you to do that” Every hunter knows you do not break off the chase until you have caught your prey…even taking the time to make this phone call has caused Zimmerman to lose visual and Zimmerman would have to pick up the trail again but he can't do that if he is stuck at location waiting for a cop. Dispatcher: What’s your address sir so the police can meet you? We know the rest!
Oh Shit, He’s Right Behind Me
Trayvon was on his final route home on the phone when he said these words…there was no escaping this relentless pursuit he had tried avoidance but Zimmerman would not let the situation be avoided so where do you run when there is nowhere to run….It ‘s time to ask the question what are you following me for. When you are being hunted there is no such thing as the prey calling off the hunt this is only reserved for the hunter for reasons like it’s to dark and late,(Zimmerman wouldn't be stopped by that-that's why you have a flashlight) the prey Is out of territory boundaries,(Zimmerman's Perspective: According to Stand Your Ground, the whole state of Florida is my territory-no problems there) mistaken identity,(no mistake he doesn't belong here...look at him). There was no way Trayvon could have stopped this, and the main reason is this Trayvon didn't start it...every confirmed reaction of Trayvon was because of one thing and one thing only, the hostile, safety threatening, life threatening hunt and pursuit actions of George Zimmerman. Why didn't you call of the hunt George, why didn't you stay in the car. The prey never can stop the hunt…but that is man to animal, but man to man the hunted has the ability to ask the hunter, “Why are you doing this?”
This is where all questions were answered and this is where the motive began that ended Trayvon’s life when Zimmerman finally caught up to Trayvon Martin and Trayvon had the opportunity to ask:
Whatcha following me for? Now in this time period this is where Zimmerman found out how wrong he was and realized the consequences of his actions because Trayvon actually had truth on his side and Zimmerman all he had now was crazy imaginations, crazy because he misinterpreted everything, crazy because everything he thought was skill and training turned out to be his own crazy delusions…What about you being in this area I, I know all my neighbors and I’ve never seen you before? I live off of….. What about the gun in your hoody? Man what gun this is some tea and some skittles... If you live there then why were you over here? It’s raining and plus you were following me like some crazy ass cracker oh like I'm supposed to lead you to my house with my little brother there? Reality set in Super-cop who was now Super-flop...his ticket into the police force became full-fledged validation of why he would never be a cop of why they would never give him a badge. What could George do the police were on their way and it is only a matter of time before they catch up to him and question him, but what is he going to say?
I f'ed Up
If I tell them what really happened I’m screwed, If he goes home and tells his family they might call it in and I’m screwed… I’ll tell them a lie but too many loose ends if they find out the truth I’m screwed….I need to make sure that he doesn’t get home I need to kill him…but how do I kill him and make it legal Then George remembered his course “Stand your Ground” he knew that in order for stand your ground to work he would have to make the killing look like self-defense, in order for self-defense to be believed there has to be a clear fight…if I can prove self-defense because of the fight then all the other problems would just melt away. At this point every action that Zimmerman took was with the goal of killing Trayvon Martin and making it look like Self-defense, it had to be done now and he was the only one to do it. This is “Depraved Indifference” because his life and his dream depended on one thing too George Zimmerman and that one thing was killing Trayvon Martin while making it look like self-defense.
Zimmerman’s attacks Trayvon- Get off, get off!
As Trayvon thought the situation was handled he began going home again he’s back on the phone and walking home then Zimmerman decides it’s now or never It has to look like self-defense...so he charged him from behind this is where the struggle began initiated by Zimmerman. The fight wasa started the way all cowards start fights he jumped him from by behind?
Witnesses 3:1 (The other 3 are lying but I’m telling the truth)
This is where the witnesses testimony start all except one who can say they have no relation to Trayvon Martin or Zimmerman…curiously the one witness who saw the same event as 3 other people has a relationship with Zimmerman and his account is different from the rest essentially 1 is telling the truth and 3 are lying but this is not the case….The real situation is that 3 are telling the truth without any self-interest and 1 is partially telling the truth for the interest of himself and his friend.
I couldn’t see...but!
Witness Good's testimony is troubling because he’s the only one of 4 that says something different but when you actually look at what he said, you find he doesn’t actually say it… “I can’t be sure if it was Trayvon or Zimmerman on top I am sure that the person on the bottom was lighter.” So why is it that you a reasonable person can’t testify as too who was on top and who was on the bottom. Or shall I ask it this way why is that you won’t say under oath who was on top and who was on bottom. You clearly want us to believe that it was Zimmerman on the bottom, but you never say it because you saw Zimmerman on both the top and the bottom… You recognized and saw Zimmerman on top before the gunshot and you saw him on the bottom after the gun shot. So I guess your answer might be kind of sort of true as long as you didn’t ask the question when was the lighter skin person on the bottom.
Pound and Ground, really?
You heard a commotion outside it was loud enough to get your attention so you went outside and when you went outside you were surprised right before your eyes was a person that looked like George your neighborhood watchman in an MMX matchup. See the thing about good friends or acquaintances is we not only recognize them when he hear them we recognize them when we see them. So if you didn’t know George when you saw him you certainly knew him when you heard him when he called out to you asking for help (Georgy was asking you for help but it wasn’t for the fight He needed help on how to clean up this mess. You walked out and saw Zimmerman who you recognized as your neighborhood watchman in control of the situation when you recognized what was happening as you described it as “Ground and Pound” you knew that he the neighborhood watchman had control of the situation or else you would have helped out your neighborhood watchman… You knew as George knew from the technique being used that George had the weight advantage and the power advantage….The reason it’s called "Ground and Pound" is that you ground your opponent or pin them to the ground with your superior weight and while they are unable to move and flat on their back you use your power to pound them…but this situation was different he saw grounding but he didn’t see pounding he saw a lot of motion but we know there weren't any blows because (we know Trayvon had no signs of fighting-this means that the person indicated by three witnesses that was on the wrong end of ground and pound had no injuries) and why is that because Zimmerman could not afford to put any signs of an altercation on Trayvon if there were any signs of an altercation Zimmerman had to make sure that he suffered them and Trayvon didn’t have any marks of a fight and at this particular time neither did Georgie. His Neighborhood watchman George had control of the situation, he knew he was trying to make the police force, and he knew that catching someone in the act of crime might make all the difference in helping his neighborhood watchman make the force so he was eager…to call the police.
I’m going to call the police
Going back to right after Good made his phone call to the police
Zimmerman's first words after shooting
Zimmerman: I need you to come and help me the police are already on the way
Why weren't they call an ambulance, because he needed Trayvon to be dead
When Good went in to make the phone call, this where Zimmerman realized Trayvon Martin, He’s got to die- and I have to make it look as if I was just defending myself...Good is going to call the police again so they will no where to come & nobody is here to see so I have to do the killing before Good comes back out of that door. This has to be just right I have to slide my hand back to my holster pull out my gun roll over positioning the perpetrator on top of me and shoot him so that he dies...end of problem. The gun had to be aimed before he rolled over because He would not have time to Aim it after he flipped...So he pressed the gun at his heart and rolled this is why the shot wasn't dead center because when he released Martin the target moved about 4" from the muzzle of the gun before it was fired.
The Gunshot-(Oh Shit! the other Person is Dead)
Strange thing to say--- the other person is dead if you don’t know the people involved and hear a gunshot…you don’t say the other person is dead you say somebody got shot. This is significant because of it’s specificity because this moment on the phone with the police it tells us exactly what a truthful testimony from Good should have been. Good told us by his recorded response…..Holy shit the other person is dead. See the last things Good saw before he called the police was George Zimmerman in control in Superior position of the Ground and Pound technique, Good heard exactly who was crying for help, we now know Trayvon Martin was crying for help and Good actually saw the gun in Zimmerman’s hand. How do we know that Good saw the gun because when the gun went off while he was on the phone with the police the cries for help immediately stopped, if Zimmerman was really the one crying for help then Good would have reasonably concluded that his neighborhood watchman was dead, but the next words of Good tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Holy shit, the other person is dead. You only say the other person is dead…when the person you know isn’t dead…and what did Good know, he knew Zimmerman- his neighborhood watchman had the gun he knew it because he saw it… he knew the cries for help stopped immediately after the gun was fired. George- the neighborhood watchman had the gun why would he be dead, he knew that the cries for help came from the other person whom Good didn't know so when the gun fired and the cries stopped...Good knew Zimmerman wasn't dead. Good knew as much and he said as much unfiltered....Holy shit, the other person is dead.
Zimmerman Screaming for His Life
I don't know why Zimmerman was screaming for his life, especially in this fight he initiated because he had all the advantages; size, experience, training, and the gun...when you look at all of that...then why was Zimmerman in a life threatening situation? There is no reasonable reason why Zimmerman should be in mortal fear of his life as indicated by Trayvon screaming in the 911 screams...even in starting the fight Zimmerman was going to win and he knew it. The weights of these two individuals was different enough that professionally they would be in different weight classes an untrained middleweight against a trained heavyweight. Who do you think would win that fight? Dividing up boxing/MMX into weight classes helped to reduce the number of lop sided victories and the ability of fighters to pick on smaller opponents. After Middleweight you have Super-Middleweight, Light-heavyweight, Cruiserweight and then you reach Heavyweight...this means Zimmerman and Trayvon would never fight in a professional matchup because the fight ticket wouldn't be fair. How can you be reasonably in fear of your life in a fight this unfair a fight you mathematically win before it is even started? This massacre to borrow a fight term happened because physically Zimmerman was not in fear of his life, he had no reason to be. In fact when you look all that occurred that George did the one thing you can't find is fear...because Super-cops have no fear. I don't know why Zimmerman would be screaming it defies common sense. But what doesn't defy common sense is why Trayvon Martin was screaming for his life and this is why...because at this time Super-cop is on top of Trayvon Martin, the gun is visible and Zimmerman had made it perfectly clear to Trayvon that tonight you’re gonna die….Trayvon was pinned down he couldn’t move and all that he could do was scream for his life. Zimmerman was on a time clock this is the time when Zimmerman told Trayvon now you are going too die, you are going to die tonight…if you don’t fight back your death will be instant and painless one bullet right through the heart. Zimmerman put the gun flush to Trayvon's heart rolled over maneuvering Trayvon on Top made sure he was in position released his grip long enough to allow Trayvon to begin pulling back and then fired: one, two, three, Four...Aim, Roll, Release, and Fire. Trayvon Martin died with hope, the last moment of hope that Trayvon Martin had was when Zimmerman rolled over and let him go 4" of separation from the gun muzzle and Trayvons heart, Trayvon was shot resulting in his death...but because Zimmerman had a plan that hope of Trayvon and Trayvon's life was cut short.
The Cover-up: He sucker punched me in my nose, He got the advantage over me, He was banging my head in the concrete, He hit me in my head at least 2wice, All the evidence will show it, I guarantee!
And this is when Good comes back on the scene asking what happened and being told by Zimmerman the truth, (because you need the truth to make the perfect lie) this where the coverup begins at the moment when you have a friendly neighbor willing to help out and a Super-cop on the scene one who knows you need physical injuries and not just any kind of injuries, you need the kind of injuries that anyone would reasonably say would put you in fear of your life. You need multiple head injuries 2 head injuries will do the job. 1 may be an accident 2 shows me that there was some intent.
We don’t have enough information to say how and who put the injuries on Zimmerman but we do know he had motive and opportunity and the police knowledge behind Zimmerman's injury plants. Police professionals know the nose bleed and the head injury are very bloody injuries they are the most bloody injuries that can be made with the least amount of force to create them, nose bleeds and head injuries both look bloody horrible…and here is the real police knowledge about head injuries is that any head injuries allow you to reasonably make a case that you were reasonably in fear of your life...if you're going to claim self-defense you better have a head injury! The nose bleed and the head injuries were both for show that’s why it never made sense that the injuries were just to minor to be received in the fight Zimmerman described...they were too damn small to be important as injuries...Zimmerman’s head injuries were consistent with someone tenderly and lovingly hitting his head on the concrete once or twice to get the look of head injuries but not the effects. Zimmerman's head injuries were made so they would get the look but not the effects. This was staged as if it were done by himself or a Good friend.
Why does this all sound so true…
The answer is simple it’s because it has to be the truth based on all the facts that we can examine…all the facts are consistent with a motive and opportunity for George Zimmerman and this cannot be disputed…the defense wanted you to believe that Trayvon Martin had motives and an opportunities and the intent for killing George Zimmerman. What are they. we can't tell because they don't exist but when we look at the other side and ask the question what motives did Zimmerman have for killing Trayvon he had at least 40+ reasons but the most important to Georgie was if Trayvon goes home alive I'll never be a police officer.
Help Me Hannity.
Do you know anything about Stand your ground….what was Zimmerman’s answer? And finally if you had it to do it all over again would you do anything differently. What was Zimmerman’s answer?
George! The 6th commandment is Thou shalt not kill. Jury...this means, It wasn’t God’s will for Trayvon to be dead, it was George Zimmerman's will. A will I know and the facts and evidence shows came from a sick, depraved, mentally unstable man who possessed the motive, the opportunity, and the depraved will that killed (ended the short Human life of Trayvon Martin). It was not God's will that killed Trayvon Martin, it was George Zimmerman’s will and gun and depraved heart that killed Trayvon Martin. It was George Zimmerman's gun that killed Trayvon Martin...It was George Zimmerman's will that Trayvon Martin had to die.
Friday, March 19, 2010
If the Right was Fiscally & Morally Right on Health Care Reform?
In asking the question "If the Right was Right on Health Care Reform" I have come to the conclusion that the upcoming vote on the health care reform bill on Sunday 2:07 PM EST is a watershed moment in our history, I know you the American national electorate understand that if the opponents of health reform were focused on doing the right thing for our nation fiscally and morally, the most responsible and compassionate action they could have undertaken would have been to contribute in the crafting of legislation in good faith with the presentation of honest philosophical partisan proposals and even partisan solution strategies and negotiate a bill which eventually they could vote their conscience on the product of what would have been but for their obstinacy a bi-partisan bill. This in fact was the preferable method for crafting a health care bill, and more importantly how the "Founding Father's" envisioned how legislation should be crafted. The "Founding Father's had hoped a legislative process was ceated that would insure that even in partisan environments if all parties involved were truly concerned with the welfare of the nation that at all times the best consensus legislation could be created through honest and open structured and procedural debate that reflected the true will and consciousness of the electorate that placed the "Senators" and "House Members" in office. At a time when true statesmen were necessary from the opposition...the opposition chose to make this issue of health care a "Waterloo" for the Presidency of Obama. In the face of so much suffering and unrighteousness performed by the insurance and health care industry rather than focusing on the well-being of the nation sadly, and clearly the opposition has operated in a manner which displays that it is more important to Conservatives, the Republican Party, some Tea Party members and all of the Birth-er Movement to discredit the Democratic Party and by association the first African American President of the USA than it is to provide Health Reform for the citizens of this nation. A nation should be concerned about the health of its citizenry....we should endeavor to regard our citizens as soldiers in as much as everyone knows that sick and dead soldiers don't win and can't fight the many battles our nation now faces. Here's a simple comparison to refute the "Government Run Health care" fear inducing "Buzz Word" argument. What would happen if you bring the nation’s military health system into parity with that of the average citizen of the United States of America in other words the average health care and ability to pay for health care would be equal as all soldiers would pay for their own health care through the free-market system and consequently would have the same average health of their civilian countrymen as it currently exits. What do you think would be the military readiness of this force? Would we as an American fighting force have the ability to maintain our military superiority if our soldiers had the same overall average health and health concerns and premium payment issues as an average American citizen? Would it make any financial sense for the government to maintain payment of higher Prescription Drug payments when we know how to lower these costs specifically and significantly or is their any fiscal logic in honoring the state by state monopoly of health care and insurance providers and pay 30% for the "For Profit Health Insurance Organization" overhead when the overhead for non-profit organizations is approximately 6% or 7% knowing the 23% or 24% difference doesn't enhance service or quality for patients but goes directly to the profits of "For Profit Health Insurance Organization" insurers. The next time someone advocates that health reform is a "Government Run Takeover" remind them that every modern soldier that has fought and won conflicts for America has had their medical health and training provided for supervised and managed by the government and if it is good enough to make our soldiers the best in the world then why isn't it adequate or good enough for our general citizens especially when the spouses and children of every member of congress is enjoying "Government Run Health care" So it's okay for our soldiers to create the best military force in the world with "Government Run Health care," it's okay for every Congressman in our Legislature Okay for every Supreme Court Justice and staff member okay for every member of the Executive Branch okay for every Federal & State elected official okay for everyone in government elected or appointed to have and use the benefits of "Government Run Health care" but the benefits of the "Government Run Health care" system which 99.9% of all Federal Government employees would not give back, decline to accept or fail to take advantage of Ala "Chainey and his 5 heart attacks," "Government Run Health care" is not okay for the average citizen. The message is clear to get the best health care you have to be a part of the club of "Government" or the "Wealthy"....average citizens run for office and replace the bum(s) that want to keep their "Government Sponsored" non-profit health care but want to leave you and your family at the mercy of the "For Profit Health Insurance Industry." The saddest and gravest irony is that your tax dollars are paying for the economic shortfall created by the Bush tax cut proposals which increased the deficit to just over 2 trillion dollars in 3 years and every uninsured person who utilizes health care services in this country and also your tax dollars are funding in real-time the government sponsored non-profit health insurance coverage for every federal employee but it can’t pay for your own individual health insurance coverage until you become a recipient of Medicare. Thank you.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
The Role of Media Apathy in Emboldening the Racist Fringe Element
"What happens when 20% of the electorate equate having a black president with the wholesale destruction of America and it's values and why the media fuels this environment when it looks the other way"
How are those who oppose the President’s policy initiatives dispersed throughout the nation and what are the demographics of the individuals who oppose the president? When you ask these two questions there is no way that you can logically deny the stark racism that is the foundation of the fierce opposition to President Obama. The reason that racists have such political influence is that on the national level their numbers may lie between 10-20% or more but on state and congressional district levels and other specific parts of the country the local range of racists voters may be as high as 90% and as low as 50% this makes it political suicide to cast aspersions on the racist vote and their political objectives so Senators and House Representatives alike from these areas don’t cast the aspersions, or address the thr true presence of the race issue in fact they play to the desires of their local constituency by practicing Dog-Whistle politics. This is the power of racism and it’s influence on American politics while on the national stage racists political power may appear to be in the minority when you get down to individual districts and election purposes and writing and passing legislation “sausage making” racism actually has a significant majority presence in influencing Senatorial and House Representative legislation decisions as well as individual Senators and House Representatives themselves. Take the Joe Wilson issue, Joe Wilson should have received some sort of public rebuke and disciplinary action for violating House decorum by his own party it should have not have had to be a sole operation launched by democrats it should have been a swift a more stringent punishment championed by his own party. In no way was an indirect apology to the Whitehouse via Chief of Staff: R. Emmanuel and VP: J. Biden the correct response for what Joe Wilson did when he publicly assailed the character of not just Obama the person but his character in office and called the POTUS a liar while the president was addressing the nation and his apology should have been just as public and just as direct as his original offense…I’m talking Joe Wilson and the President on stage together with Joe Wilson apologizing to the president with all the nation watching. It is political poisonfor this President to get involved in any race tinged discussion because it only distracts attention from his policy objectives. But all the leadership of the Republican party required of Representative wilson was an indirect apology (so as to make the argument we don’t approve of how he did but I understand and support why he did it)…also they imposed no consequences for the affront in fact they benefit politically by making it appear that it is a partisan witch hunt by the democrats instead of what it was a necessary precedent busting remedy for Wilson’s egregious and possibly planned behavior. It has been said by Joe Scarborough that there is no way you can dismiss 20% of voters and expect to win elections on the national stage…there’s your answer that’s why 10 to 20 percent of racists have so much political influence on American politics when they are united…and that’s why you should not and cannot whitewash the influence and impact of racists in American politics as responsible commentators. As an African American I have a hard time understanding why an entire panel of commentators save for the one black guy has a hard time seeing the obvious role of racists in perpetuating policy an legislative terrorism and illuminating the political strategy and motives that are at play. By denying that racism has significant political support in America it is an ultimate insult and misrepresentation that racism doesn’t affect political discussion/discourse in America. “Do you remember the Southern Strategy do you remember the amount of significant power wielded and achieved by KKK sympathizers politically throughout the historical structure of this government. The Morning Joe panel makes an argument that of course with the 1st African American POTUS there is going to be those racist that act out but they don't exist in any significant quantity certainly not enough that their impact can inform, alter, or drive policy. There is a distinct prescience of obliviousness and/or indifference particularly by members of the media who claim not to be racist on the topic of the political and historical abuse of racism now and in the past and it's role in today's political discussions and I can’t discern whether or not that obliviousness is intentional or unintentional especially when topics of racism appear most singularly with this POTUS while the PC and the extremist way of addressing the issue is to summarily dismiss racisms influence though downplaying it’s importance. The point is racists do exist in significant #’s that allow them to have a very significant political impact and they receive money and funding from interests from entities whose sole directive is to stop this POTUS policy objectives. I believe that anywhere between 10% and 20% of America have irrational racial attitudes and cannot accept the fact that America has a Negro as President. It’s a very simple prospect that racists are being stimulated and funded by corporate interests to rabble rouse. They achieve their shared objective of disrupting perhaps sinking the Obama Presidency by disguising themselves as people of mainstream viewpoints politically on issues who are just voicing their opposition to particular policies when in fact they have no knowledge of the policies and could care less about the policy or the political debate and their main purpose is to shutdown the debate process not to respectively participate in it, their purpose is not to review or decide upon factual information or issues but instead to vociferously inject misinformation and fear into the dialogue that distracts from the topical and factual debate. To prove their point Morning Joe cites the presidents slide in poll numbers as being the result of individual voter dissatisfaction with Obama policy aspirations making no room for the intense organizational priming of the pump by right-wing extremist who oppose the president based solely on race this is what president Carter meant to convey that an overwhelming amount of the “Extremist” who oppose Obama in fact oppose him because he is Black. The Morning Joe Team has misinterpreted Carter’s statement as a veiled attempt by Carter to label all national opposition to Obama’s policy initiatives as a race infused mainstream phenomena instead of the ranting of a small but powerful and vociferous racist lunatic fringe. The Morning Joe misnomer is that Carter is calling all national mainstream opposition to Obama racist bigots and he does so at the peril of insulting the crossover independent vote by erroneously reducing their opposition to racism instead of recognizing their policy dissent as legitimate issues. Carter never said that everybody that opposes Obama’s policies are racist. Specifically what Carter said was that an overwhelming majority of the “Extremists” are in fact racists and the political maps demonstrate this beyond a doubt to any Media Comentator, or Op Ad Journalist, or Political Entertainer who seriously examines the evidence there is overwhelming evidence that race is prevalent dynamic issue in today's political discourse and is the greatest factor in keeping an already polarized nation further divided. To many media personlities are acting if the racism that exists in todays debate is insignificant and has no bearing on the national discourse and policy making procedures. You cannot solve a problem until you acknowledge that a problem exist and in as much as the Media along with vested corporate interests do not acknowledge that racism is the central problem in american politics that is affecting every major piece of constructive legislation and it only emboldens covert racial beliefs to become agressive racial displays and acts of violence. When racism is denied to exist until it grows to become overt acts...then God hepl us all. There is a current story when it comes to race and politics in America
How are those who oppose the President’s policy initiatives dispersed throughout the nation and what are the demographics of the individuals who oppose the president? When you ask these two questions there is no way that you can logically deny the stark racism that is the foundation of the fierce opposition to President Obama. The reason that racists have such political influence is that on the national level their numbers may lie between 10-20% or more but on state and congressional district levels and other specific parts of the country the local range of racists voters may be as high as 90% and as low as 50% this makes it political suicide to cast aspersions on the racist vote and their political objectives so Senators and House Representatives alike from these areas don’t cast the aspersions, or address the thr true presence of the race issue in fact they play to the desires of their local constituency by practicing Dog-Whistle politics. This is the power of racism and it’s influence on American politics while on the national stage racists political power may appear to be in the minority when you get down to individual districts and election purposes and writing and passing legislation “sausage making” racism actually has a significant majority presence in influencing Senatorial and House Representative legislation decisions as well as individual Senators and House Representatives themselves. Take the Joe Wilson issue, Joe Wilson should have received some sort of public rebuke and disciplinary action for violating House decorum by his own party it should have not have had to be a sole operation launched by democrats it should have been a swift a more stringent punishment championed by his own party. In no way was an indirect apology to the Whitehouse via Chief of Staff: R. Emmanuel and VP: J. Biden the correct response for what Joe Wilson did when he publicly assailed the character of not just Obama the person but his character in office and called the POTUS a liar while the president was addressing the nation and his apology should have been just as public and just as direct as his original offense…I’m talking Joe Wilson and the President on stage together with Joe Wilson apologizing to the president with all the nation watching. It is political poisonfor this President to get involved in any race tinged discussion because it only distracts attention from his policy objectives. But all the leadership of the Republican party required of Representative wilson was an indirect apology (so as to make the argument we don’t approve of how he did but I understand and support why he did it)…also they imposed no consequences for the affront in fact they benefit politically by making it appear that it is a partisan witch hunt by the democrats instead of what it was a necessary precedent busting remedy for Wilson’s egregious and possibly planned behavior. It has been said by Joe Scarborough that there is no way you can dismiss 20% of voters and expect to win elections on the national stage…there’s your answer that’s why 10 to 20 percent of racists have so much political influence on American politics when they are united…and that’s why you should not and cannot whitewash the influence and impact of racists in American politics as responsible commentators. As an African American I have a hard time understanding why an entire panel of commentators save for the one black guy has a hard time seeing the obvious role of racists in perpetuating policy an legislative terrorism and illuminating the political strategy and motives that are at play. By denying that racism has significant political support in America it is an ultimate insult and misrepresentation that racism doesn’t affect political discussion/discourse in America. “Do you remember the Southern Strategy do you remember the amount of significant power wielded and achieved by KKK sympathizers politically throughout the historical structure of this government. The Morning Joe panel makes an argument that of course with the 1st African American POTUS there is going to be those racist that act out but they don't exist in any significant quantity certainly not enough that their impact can inform, alter, or drive policy. There is a distinct prescience of obliviousness and/or indifference particularly by members of the media who claim not to be racist on the topic of the political and historical abuse of racism now and in the past and it's role in today's political discussions and I can’t discern whether or not that obliviousness is intentional or unintentional especially when topics of racism appear most singularly with this POTUS while the PC and the extremist way of addressing the issue is to summarily dismiss racisms influence though downplaying it’s importance. The point is racists do exist in significant #’s that allow them to have a very significant political impact and they receive money and funding from interests from entities whose sole directive is to stop this POTUS policy objectives. I believe that anywhere between 10% and 20% of America have irrational racial attitudes and cannot accept the fact that America has a Negro as President. It’s a very simple prospect that racists are being stimulated and funded by corporate interests to rabble rouse. They achieve their shared objective of disrupting perhaps sinking the Obama Presidency by disguising themselves as people of mainstream viewpoints politically on issues who are just voicing their opposition to particular policies when in fact they have no knowledge of the policies and could care less about the policy or the political debate and their main purpose is to shutdown the debate process not to respectively participate in it, their purpose is not to review or decide upon factual information or issues but instead to vociferously inject misinformation and fear into the dialogue that distracts from the topical and factual debate. To prove their point Morning Joe cites the presidents slide in poll numbers as being the result of individual voter dissatisfaction with Obama policy aspirations making no room for the intense organizational priming of the pump by right-wing extremist who oppose the president based solely on race this is what president Carter meant to convey that an overwhelming amount of the “Extremist” who oppose Obama in fact oppose him because he is Black. The Morning Joe Team has misinterpreted Carter’s statement as a veiled attempt by Carter to label all national opposition to Obama’s policy initiatives as a race infused mainstream phenomena instead of the ranting of a small but powerful and vociferous racist lunatic fringe. The Morning Joe misnomer is that Carter is calling all national mainstream opposition to Obama racist bigots and he does so at the peril of insulting the crossover independent vote by erroneously reducing their opposition to racism instead of recognizing their policy dissent as legitimate issues. Carter never said that everybody that opposes Obama’s policies are racist. Specifically what Carter said was that an overwhelming majority of the “Extremists” are in fact racists and the political maps demonstrate this beyond a doubt to any Media Comentator, or Op Ad Journalist, or Political Entertainer who seriously examines the evidence there is overwhelming evidence that race is prevalent dynamic issue in today's political discourse and is the greatest factor in keeping an already polarized nation further divided. To many media personlities are acting if the racism that exists in todays debate is insignificant and has no bearing on the national discourse and policy making procedures. You cannot solve a problem until you acknowledge that a problem exist and in as much as the Media along with vested corporate interests do not acknowledge that racism is the central problem in american politics that is affecting every major piece of constructive legislation and it only emboldens covert racial beliefs to become agressive racial displays and acts of violence. When racism is denied to exist until it grows to become overt acts...then God hepl us all. There is a current story when it comes to race and politics in America
Friday, March 20, 2009
Itemized Response to the Dillard Report and It's Position on the Cause of the Financial Crisis
We can reject the socialist argument that deregulation of the private financial system was a contributing cause of the financial meltdown of 2008. In reality, government regulation of this market sector significantly increased over the seventeen years leading up to the crisis
of bundled loan packages (List the government regulations that were imposed during the period of 1999-2006 that curtailed the development of CDOs (Collateralized Debt Obligations), CDSs, (Credit Default Swaps) or those that specifically supervised and regulated the burgeoning home mortgage lenders or regulated the new securities, (stock) classes what were created and exploited also list the regulations that governed how banks and other financial institutions interacted with Wall Street with respect to this new securitization scheme developed during the corresponding period in question)
You have been led to believe the deregulation story through reporting that shows only one small and insignificant aspect of government influence. Please read more to get the truth.(Glass Steagall was a regulation already in place since the depression era mind you which prevented the event of trading single stock options from even existing….meaning that w/ Glass Steagall in the law you could not create market or sell a bundled loan package as a stock…it’s repeal by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is not a small insignificant aspect of government influence it is in fact the fundamental foundation of this crisis but for the repeal of Glass Steagall you could not have even created let alone sell the product of bundled loan packages which is undeniably at the root of the entire Home mortgage lending financial crisis)
Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, defines regulation as "controlling human or societal behavior by rules or restrictions. Regulation “mandated by the state”
(These are the goals of any & all regulation even when a business self-regulates it does so to achieve the goals that you outlined & those goals)
are attempts to produce outcomes which might not otherwise occur, produce or prevent outcomes in different places to what might otherwise occur, or produce or prevent outcomes in different timescales than would otherwise occur.”(those goals are not simply restricted to regulations authored by the state but are global to any and all types of regulations authored so why specifically infer that state mandated regulations are the only type of regulations that we need worry about when it is plainly obvious that your desired operating environment preference is too have no regulation on private enterprise at all.)
Banks working towards lower profitability, by making bad loans, is not an outcome that would occur naturally. A strategy for failure is not in the business plan of any bank.(here is where we differ in your opinion “regulations” are the cause of Banks working a strategy toward lower profitability Specifically those imposed by government or state mandated agencies….I see it as their own greed predicated on the belief that these organizations believed that they had found a strategy toward unlimited profitability because they were insulated from the consequences of bad loans this is where CDOs +CDSs (Collateralized Debt Obligations & Credit Default Swaps) and there flawed concept impact the judgment of financial institutions and disrupt the foundations of our economy…These businessman actually believed that through the combination of CDSs and CDOs they could insulate and absolve themselves of all liability in the case of loan default distorting the basic fundamental operating logic and processes of the market to the point that they believed it was possible to create a perfect tool that posed no risk precisely because you were paid if the loan was paid and you were also paid when the loan was defaulted because you sold the loan and those whom you sold the loan too held the debt. (You further insured yourself against defaulted loans with the agencies that held these debts that knowingly used leveraged asset totals instead of actual asset totals in order to deliberately convolute and obscure the mark to market requirements….which simply states a lending institution cannot insure that which it does not have assets to insure. “You must be able to prove/guarantee that you have the assets required to pay your claims” All business have a survival instinct…and yet suicide exists only in human nature!)
It is clear that government, the Clinton administration with their allies in big media and leftist activist groups and later the Bush administration, imposed regulations on banks that produced the desired outcome of expanded minority and low income home ownership.
(It is true that democrats are generally in favor of more low income home ownership and also true that Republicans are generally in favor of less regulation of the private sector what occurred here was that politicians were told by Wall Street that the only way to achieve that goal was through less regulation)
To enable this outcome, federal banking regulators moved against safe lending practices in the name of “community reinvestment.”(You mean the SEC under a republican administration allowed deregulation of specific home mortgage products and entities…to blame the federal banking regulators for moving against safe lending practices you have to explain which safe lending practices were specifically moved on by federal banking regulators and how they were moved. Also the concept of the government forcing the private sector to “move” against safe lending practices is an asinine observation & conclusion; those financial organizations chose to abandon and not to use safe lending practices precisely because they believe they could make a profit either way.)
Severe political pressure was applied to mortgage providers to increasingly lower their lending standards,(What constitutes “Severe Political Pressure”, I thought businessman lobby congress not the other way around the only political pressure that congress can implement over private entities is regulation and certainly the regulatory environment created wasn’t an environment that kept mortgage lenders from operating in fact they over-produced in there functioning…they blew up the housing bubble)
eventually spawning the now infamous NINJA LOANS loans for borrowers with "No Income, no Job or Assets." Regulators measured bank performance,(and they specifically by design and with rabid consent intended that they didn’t regulate mortgage lenders, bankers participating in mortgage lending, or their financial relationship with Wall Street and again but for the repeal of Glass Steagall and the CFMA they wouldn’t even be competing within the stock market)
and punishment/reward feedback mechanisms were (not) effectively utilized.(Half of the problem which was the conduct and practices of the mortgage lenders and Wall Street never received regulation and in fact received stimulative deregulation which exacerbated the problem)
In nature, species adapt to new conditions in the environment or perish –natural selection. For the seventeen years prior the financial meltdown, banks adapted to a new regulatory environment,
(by actively creating a deregulated environment)
with new conditions for survival –political selection.(If you deregulate I’ll help you with your upcoming election gee sounds like political selection too me banks asking what politician can I select in order to get this industry deregulated. * Note Republican fundraising totals and electoral dominance during this period)
Banks developed lending strategies, such as Subprime Mortgages loans to achieve the government/activist’s desired outcome.(the banks were not operating in order to achieve the government/activist’s desired outcome they were operating to achieve their own profitable outcome…Even a business novice understands that businesses never operates to advance any other entities outcomes before they achieve their own desired outcome and that desired outcome is always more profit. To suggest that the banks developed unethical and self-destructive lending strategies such as Subprime Mortgages loans; simply to please the government/activist’s doesn’t pass the smell test)
When applications for new branches were declined due to poor performance, banks took action (The wrong action instead of fixing performance issues with sound financial principles they abandoned them for a supposed guaranteed profitability machine). When competitors, with more(unstable ill-advised) low income loans, threatened lucrative government contracts, staff was mobilized.
(Providing more unstable ill-advised loans than their competitors did) When newspapers or activist broadcast racial discrimination claims (redlining is a proven fact)
, banks initiated new programs.(The new programs did nothing to solve the fundamentals of Redlining, but instead; replaced the process with the now infamous NINJA LOANS loans because they feared no risk in giving those loans.) Banks adapted. (No, banks Terra-Formed instead of adapting to the environment that was around them they tried to create the environment that they would be most comfortable in irrespective of the destruction of the environment that we all have to live in)
Wall Street ‘greed’ as an explanation is pure pandering to the unthinking. The crisis was triggered by the failure of one segment of financial products
(through package bundling touched every aspect of our whole economic system and because they were also sold internationally affected global financial markets as well) – Subprime Mortgages and Alt-A mortgages, (Remember that in the beginning Alt-A mortgages were not credit worthy enough for the GSEs because of their higher probability for default due it was when GSE’s began deregulating their previous credit lending standards that GSE’s became linked with the dynamics of Subprime Mortgages Mortgage Crisis)
and mortgage backed securities. The driving force in this market, buying and selling, were the (Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.The (GSEs) came late to this crisis they came in when they erroneously perceived that these loans were sound after the Gaussian Copula Model seemed to validate why CDOs and CDSs were profitable and you had by that time experienced 2-4 years of a bear housing market a decision was made by the GSEs to participate in this believed surefire mechanism advanced by both wall street and mortgage lenders)
since the GSEs are implicitly backed by the US government, the risk is very low,The Bankers, Mortgage Lenders, and Wall Street utilized the high credit rating of the GSEs to market package and sell more securities this was pivotal in marketing to international investors since these securities had obtained AAA credit ratings and cross validation through their association with GSEs even though, all (meaning Bankers, Mortgage Lenders, and Wall Street knew
, know many of these mortgages will go into foreclosure. As we now know implicit equals reality.Acceptance of the link between deregulation of private business and the financial crisis is more revealing of a socialist mentality than reality.
(I would modify this statement to say ‘Acceptance of the link between deregulation of private business and the financial crisis is the only reality’) Decades prior to the crisis, regulation increased dramatically. Also specific and targeted deregulation increased dramatically
Some point to the 1999 repeal of part of the Glass Steagall Act(by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act)
legislation that regulated financial company ownership as a definite contributing factor. However, there is no empiric data to link the Subprime Mortgages problem and toxic assets to making our financial structure more competitive by allowing banks and securities companies and insurance companies to compete against each other.(the whole point of repealing Glass Steagall was to make it possible to prove that banks and insurance companies can compete together, a practice by the way that had been banned by the act since1938 because then it was proven by the depression itself that the risks of allowing this type of competition outweighed the gains in our economic system. Competition leads to stronger individuals and systems. It is not Competition itself that leads to stronger individuals and systems, it is fair and regulated Competition that leads to stronger individuals and systems. Capitalism itself is a system and systems are governed by principles and rules (regulations) in order to function. Capitalism cannot function correctly in the absence of regulation.)
Finally, to suggest, as some have, that Glass Steagall would have compartmentalized the fire and therefore limited the scope of the crisis ignores a fundamental fact:
(The actual fundamental fact is that a fully intact Glass Steagall would have absolutely and 100% prevented this crisis…the crisis could not and did not happen until part of Glass Steagall was repealed there is no argument that can be made to hide this fact, your argument is illogical)
the number of bad loans would have been the same because government set goals and objectives would have been met. It did not matter whether the toxic assets were held by a few or the many; it was the scale of the problem that they overwhelmed the system.(What? It seems that you are arguing that even with Glass Steagall some type of government quota system in which the government mandated an unspecified number of bad loans be given as an objective imposed on Banks, Mortgage Companies, and Wall Street would have existed any way… simply because the government sets a goal or objective that means that it will be met! The last time I heard Zero has no scale…and if you take off the condom don’t be surprised when she tells you your baby is coming especially when if you had left that condom on you would absolutely be sure that the baby that is coming didn’t come from you.)
Unfortunately, the fundamental forces that led to this unnatural business environment have not changed.
This statement is erroneous new corrective and preventative regulations have been implemented since approximately circa 2006 through to the present to prevent this crisis situation from happening again. Unfortunately, the fundamental mental forces and attitudes that led to this unnatural business environment have not changed there are still participants who even now don’t accept any responsibility for the crisis they had part in creating…you cannot solve problems if you refuse to realize there are problems especially within ones’ own conscience. But, in fact what made this business environment unnatural was not the application of fundamentals or regulations in fact it was the absence of fundamentals and regulations that allowed it to flourish. What made this business environment unnatural was the suspension of common sense supplanted by overwhelming greed in pursuit of the unnatural belief that what goes up never comes down….It seems the effects of gravity affect capitalism to or is it reality?
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Kramer blows, W.S. was responsible for giving value to toxic assets in the beginning so why are they denying their responsibility for doing it now?
Is it just me or does it seems as if, “Wall Street” is protesting to much? First there was Ratigan, Santelli, and now Kramer (all of which profited from our economic murder by being willing coconspirators who now only after the crime of uncensored and unlimited greed has been revealed claim only to be unwilling witnesses instead of their true role of being active accomplices. We all agree that something needs to be done to aid the current model of our national banking system, (aid not save because fundamentally the entire banking system and “Wall Street” both need to be re-regulated) but, “Wall Street” would have you believe that they were not culpable for the disastrous results of their actions. Remember that the only reason we have toxic assets on the books of these AAA credit rated entities is that “Wall Street” figured out a way to sell a valueless product by making it look profitable to theses AAA credit rated entities. “Wall Street,” in conjunction with “Banks” and other under-regulated or unregulated entities created (wrapped, bundled) and sold securities products that had no asset-backed value, which allowed banks to leverage their balance sheets “literally creating and assigning value out of thin air”. It is ludicrous now for “Wall Street” to request that the government fix the banking crisis when they are the engineers and reason for its existence. The government has no tools to remove private toxic assets from the ledgers of private unregulated institutions. If so tell me what those tools are. The government can infuse the liquidity that banks need to function until the “Banks” and “Wall Street” can resolve the toxic asset issue “more like unprecedented catastrophe” but that is all that it can do in this situation when the crisis originated in the private sector in an unregulated environment domestic in scope and largely international. What the “Fed” is responsible for is designing and implementing the regulatory structure/framework that the new economic system will operate under and this is what “Wall Street” fears, this is the uncertainty that they base their refusal to operate in the methods and modes of their responsibility to the capitalistic system by investing in the future of this nation, instead they sell and in the process sellout this economy all the while claiming that there is nothing worthy of investing in the economy, (when what they mean is that they cannot figure out what to invest in that would bring them the immediate profit margins that they were use to). They pine that there is no hope when faced with the very reality that they cannot make easy money in the unaccountable way that they had become accustomed to because the money party is over, but what gets lost in this whole thing is that they had no business giving this money party, thus they are the ones that should be responsible for cleaning it up. The government has no mechanism to clean up unregulated private toxic assets, it can stop this event from happening again in the future through applying regulation, it can keep the "Financial Industry" and also “Wall Street” short term on life support by supplying liquidity but "Wall Street" must start to stimulate the economy by initiating the investing in "America" instead of blaming the government for this current crisis. Wall Street's fears of future regulation is no excuse or substitute for not providing economic stimulation now, economic stimulus and funding is the purpose of Wall Street in our capitalist system that purpose is not the natural assignment of the government.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
